Few bites from fishermen on Peterson sturgeon alibi
By GARTH STAPLEY
BEE STAFF WRITER
Last Updated: November 30, 2003, 11:03:43 AM PST
Details from Scott Peterson's preliminary hearing about his Christmas Eve fishing trip left some already skeptical fishermen with more doubt.
"None of his story made any sense," said Carl Costley of Oakdale, who has fished 35 years for huge, tough-skinned sturgeon. "It just doesn't hold water."
Said Robert Kisner of Denair, "Pretty much any fisherman will tell you that guy didn't go out there fishing. It could be that he just didn't know what he was doing."
When word spread about Peterson's solo excursion soon after his pregnant wife disappeared 11 months ago, Costley and Kisner, among others, frowned.
The swelling San Francisco Bay is no place for a relatively small aluminum boat, many said. Most added that it's crazy to fish alone for sturgeon, which often top 100 pounds and 6 feet in length. Others who prefer to start at daybreak chuckled at the thought of Peterson launching after noon.
And now, they say, recent news about his gear, anchor and licenses gives them more reasons to doubt.
********************************************
Details from the hearing were limited to attorneys questioning detectives. In a nutshell, they said:
They found two unopened packages of lures in Peterson's pickup.
They recovered from his boat an "ultralight stream fishing pole," a "heavier pole" and a homemade 1-gallon concrete anchor.
They found five fishing licenses apparently belonging to Peterson: a two-day permit valid Dec. 23 and 24; other two-day permits issued in August 2002, October 1999 and July 1999; and a yearlong license issued in 1994.
Peterson "couldn't say" what type of fish he was trying to catch when a police officer asked him Dec. 24.
Peterson did not respond when his wife's stepfather, an avid fisherman, commented that Peterson had left late in the day for fishing.
********************************************
Brocchini said he found unopened lures in Peterson's truck. That does not square with fishing for sturgeon -- which show no interest in metal lures but rely on a keen sense of smell to find herring roe and shrimp on the bottom of the bay, several fishermen said. Bait -- not lures -- replicates that food source.
"If he was using lures, he was not going sturgeon fishing," said Steve Perkins of Fisherman's Warehouse in Manteca.
Different poles for different fish
Many anglers keep all their gear together, whether going to a mountain stream or the ocean. That is the only plausible reason Peterson would have lures and a light stream rod in his boat, said Ken Moore of Ripon.
Using a light stream rod to catch sturgeon "is like hunting an elephant with a .22," or a rifle more suited for squirrels or rabbits, Costley said. "It's not practical."
Others acknowledged that some anglers bring light rods to catch bait, which they then use to try catching sturgeon with a larger pole. But that wouldn't fit with the profile police painted of Peterson -- a fisherman new to sturgeon fishing in a newly purchased boat on its maiden voyage in salt water.
Several experienced sturgeon fishermen said a concrete anchor made in a 1-gallon pitcher would hold a 14-foot boat in calm water. None believed it would work in the bay, where "rip-roaring currents," in Moore's words, are common.
"Worthless," Moore said of Peterson's homemade anchor.
Most bay anglers use heavy anchors with flukes that unfold, turn down and dig in.
"The bottom of that bay is so muddy and slimy," Costley said, "that a dead weight will generally just slide along in the mud."
*****************************************************
Unless Peterson had other fishing licenses that detectives didn't turn up, he wasn't an ardent fisherman, the anglers said.
His last year-round license was issued in 1994. Currently, one costs $30.70, compared with $11.05 for a two-day permit.
"If you're an avid fisherman, you're going to be going more than two days out of the year, so that doesn't make much sense," Perkins said.
But it also wouldn't make much sense to buy a yearly license -- which lasts until the end of the calendar year -- in late December.
People can buy two-day licenses well before a particular trip. But they're supposed to designate upon purchase the two consecutive days they will fish, said Perkins, who has sold licenses for eight years.
And that raises questions about Peterson's intentions. Brocchini testified that Peterson told him late Dec. 24 he had decided to go fishing on the spur of the moment that morning, because "it was too cold to go golfing."
On Dec. 23, Peterson told his wife and her sister, Amy Rocha, that he planned to golf the next day, Rocha testified. And, Peterson offered to pick up a gift at a shop near his country club, Rocha said.
Peterson's fishing license was valid Dec. 23 and 24, Brocchini testified. That could figure into the prosecution theory that the murder was premeditated.
A neighbor's testimony
Further muddying the water was testimony from Amie Krigbaum, a neighbor who said Scott Peterson told her late Dec. 24 he had golfed that day.
*******************************
Note from DragonFly2: Wherever you see a line of "stars", I "cut out" part of the article, in keeping with Modesto Bee's request that we not post articles in their entirety. But I hesitate just to put a link, because later when we want to access this info, the articles are gone or the link is different.
Anyway, the link for this entire article is:
http://www.modbee.com/local/story/7829005p-8715184c.html
Printer-friendly copy
, Dec-01-03, 02:42 PM, (2)
